The webinar series will culminate with a discussion about what makes an argument good. Participants will gain a two-step process that students can use to evaluate and strengthen their arguments in argument map form, either solo or in a peer-review process. We will also consider the role of objections and rebuttals in argument development.
This is the fourth and final presentation in the webinar series, How We Argue. Each webinar is structured to stand alone but also work together. You may sign up to attend one or all of the webinars during registration.
All Times Eastern
How We Argue Webinar Series
Educators often want to discuss current issues and empower students to engage as active citizens. Yet, when discussing controversial topics, some students rely on unsubstantiated facts or emotional appeals, rather than evidence and reasoning. How can we teach students to listen respectfully and defend their views courageously - to cultivate both empathy and logical rigor?
This webinar series will show participants how to use a simple, powerful tool called argument mapping to help students develop and support their own claims, as well as to better understand those with whom they disagree. Research from top universities shows that argument mapping significantly improves students’ critical thinking skills and may even decrease partisan polarization. In particular, we’ll discuss how argument mapping can help students develop the skill of intellectual charity - the ability to engage with controversial arguments with precision and care and interpret them in the best light.
- February 15: Teach Students to Argue with Reason and Empathy
- March 22: How to Disagree
- April 12: Arguing with and about Politics and Ethics
- May 10: What Makes an Argument Good?