Social Education 58(1), 1994, pp. 36-38
National Council for the Social Studies

The Challenge of Social Studies for Limited English Proficient Students

Deborah J. Short
The changing demographic picture of students in American elementary and secondary schools is well documented. The fastest growing sector of the school-aged population is that of minority students. Within that group are ever-increasing numbers of language minority students: students whose first or home language is not English. These language minority students are doubly burdened, struggling to learn English and the subject matter from various content courses.
Schools often place language minority students who are limited English proficient (LEP) in English as a second language (ESL) classes or in bilingual education classes where available. As the students from ESL classes make the transition to mainstream classes, they are usually first enrolled in physical education, art, and music classes under the assumption that these hands-on classes depend less upon language than the core curriculum classes. In general, students next enter mathematics or science classes.1 The math placement is guided by a belief that math is computation-bound and therefore easier to manage than language. (This assumption is inaccurate, but nevertheless drives instructional programming for LEP students in many schools.) As for science, LEP students tend to be successful in science classes that provide considerable manipulative and hands-on experiments, especially if the teacher has been trained to adjust instruction and adapt materials to suit the academic needs of LEP students. They are later placed in mainstream social studies courses which are more difficult because they depend heavily upon English language proficiency.

This article will examine some challenges that social studies presents to LEP students and one effort undertaken to increase the meaning and relevance of this core subject to students who are learning English while they are learning social studies.

The Challenge of Social Studies
At first blush, social studies classes seem to be likely candidates for LEP students to attend in a mainstream track. For one reason, many ESL and bilingual teachers focus on culture, even as they teach language. They help students adapt to the culture of the school and of American society. They create lessons that describe the historical backgrounds of holidays like Thanksgiving and the Fourth of July. They also plan activities in which students can share their native cultures and some history from their native countries with their peers. These topics are natural components of social studies curricula and fit the needs of LEP students. Another reason why social studies is appealing is its narrative structure. Telling a story is a universal teaching method with its origins in the ancient past. All students are familiar with this approach to teaching and learning.

The reality of social studies curricula, however, reveals a more complex picture. Social studies education is closely bound to literacy skills. Beginning at the upper elementary level, the amount of reading and writing teachers expect from students in social studies classes surpasses that of most math or science classes. Furthermore, most of the readings are expository, not narrative, in style. Long reading passages are filled with abstract concepts and unfamiliar events and names. Checking a bilingual dictionary for "representative democracy," for example, will probably not help a student who has recently arrived from Cuba where the student has had little acquaintance or familiarity with the concept. In addition, research has shown that many history textbooks are not well-written, often lacking coherence and cohesion between sections. (See Beck, McKeown, and Gromoll 1989 and Crismore 1985 for a fuller discussion.)

The Challenges of Writing Tasks
Social studies writing tasks are also challenging. In many classes, teachers pay little attention to paragraph development because they may consider writing processes to be the domain of the language arts teacher. Yet LEP students frequently need assistance in organizing information within the context of an academic subject. Essays written on social studies events or phenomena often require considerable background knowledge and higher-order thinking skills, such as summarizing and analyzing. Some students, and not only LEP students, have had little training in composing a summary or interpreting an event.

Moreover, even though cause and effect and compare and contrast are common rhetorical styles in historical writing, LEP students may not have had experience with such writing tasks. Imagine an LEP student who emigrated to the United States two months ago, placed in a world studies class, and given the following for homework: "Compare the Nigerians' methods for achieving independence with the American colonists' methods." This student would be hard pressed to respond if he or she never had an American history course. Although these types of assignments are inevitable, a teacher should be sensitive that LEP students may lack the background knowledge to make such a comparison and should make appropriate accommodations.

Instructional Tools
Unlike mathematics and science classes, social studies classes, especially at the middle school level and above, are not replete with hands-on and manipulative activities that LEP students can use to learn and reinforce specific concepts. Fraction bars or three-dimensional polygon shapes, for example, can help students grasp certain mathematics concepts, but no similar instructional tools are available for social studies teachers. Some social studies teachers are able to include role plays and diorama constructions in their lessons, but in general, LEP students, many of whom have learning styles that prefer hands-on approaches, are at more of a disadvantage in social studies than in science or mathematics.

Pictures are useful instructional tools, but teachers must exercise caution with those found in social studies textbooks. Social studies illustrations often represent the scene of an event, a portrait of a famous person, or a landform. These are somewhat helpful because they provide students with definite images. However, LEP students would also be served by using series of illustrations that demonstrate processes and by increasing the use of graphic organizers, such as timelines, flow charts, and semantic webs. Representing information visually benefits language learners because it highlights important points and reduces dependence on written text. Once students become accustomed to graphic organizers, they often turn to them for pre-writing activities or for improving their study skills.

Traditional scope and sequence designs that assume social studies knowledge will expand over the grade levels also pose difficulties for LEP students who enter midstream. Under the expanding communities (environments) approach in the primary grades, concepts and objectives taught in first grade are reviewed and built upon in later years. Thus, newly arrived LEP third graders find it hard to catch up because background knowledge is implicit in the third grade social studies materials and schools do not have the resources or time to teach first and second grade social studies curricula to these third grade LEP students.

Similarly, immigrant students who enter at the eighth grade level may flounder. The California History-Social Science Framework (1987) advocates teaching different segments of American history, covering, for example, the mid-1400s to 1850 in the fifth grade and 1783 to 1914 in the eighth. This practice, however helpful for the mainstream class that has more and more curricular material to cover, nonetheless raises problems for LEP students. Even though the framework recommends a review unit, "Connecting with Past Learnings," a brief review will not provide the LEP students with the depth of knowledge that many teachers and textbooks expect of them. As at the elementary level, the lack of time and resources preclude most schools from instructing the LEP students in the social studies curricula of earlier grades. Moreover, many students who come from other countries have been exposed to non-Western, non-Euro-centered histories. The school's textbook often does not reflect their different historical perspectives.

A Current Effort
Given this difficult situation, what can help these students? The language minority students that enter U.S. schools at the secondary level do not have time to delay academic instruction. Although LEP students need only two to three years to master social language skills in English, research has shown that it takes five to seven years for most LEP students to achieve a level of proficiency in academic English that is on par with the average mainstreamed, native English-speaking student (Collier 1989; Cummins 1980). Thus, LEP students need to begin receiving instruction in content concepts and skills early in their educational experience.

One response to this difficult situation has come from the National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning,2 an organization concerned with improving the education of language minority students. Funded by the U.S. Department of Education, several Center research projects are investigating classes in which language minority students are developing their English language skills at the same time they are studying content area courses. One project, "Integrating Language and Culture in the Social Studies," focuses on middle school social studies classes with LEP students.

In this project, research staff at the Center for Applied Linguistics are investigating ways that classroom teachers can strengthen LEP students' academic language competence, develop and implement social studies lessons that are sensitive to the cultural and educational backgrounds of the students, and promote these students as multicultural resources in a social studies class. The project aims to demonstrate to teachers that having students from other countries in the class is advantageous to the course of study. These students can add information and first-hand experiences about current events, historical happenings, and geographic features in their native countries that teachers can incorporate into lessons.

Successful Instructional Practices
The project team has also been observing effective teachers to catalog successful instructional practices. In the summer of 1991, project staff worked with teacher consultants to develop a history unit, "Protest and the American Revolution," that incorporates many of these techniques. While the staff developed the lessons, they kept in mind current trends in pedagogy on how LEP students learn content topics best.

With respect to social studies, pedagogical practices indicate that LEP students benefit from instruction that:

1.offers opportunities to communicate about social studies in oral, written, physical, or pictorial form;
2.makes connections between the content being taught and students' real-life experiences;
3.taps the students as resources for information about their native countries;
4.activates students' background knowledge;
5.provides hands-on and performance-based activities;
6.promotes critical thinking and study skill development;
7.pays attention to language issues and makes accommodations that will help students learn the language of social studies;
8.uses graphic organizers to help students represent information and identify relationships;
9.incorporates cooperative learning activities and seeks peer tutors among classmates;
10.is process-oriented and provides models to help students make the transition to academic tasks;
11.opens discussion to different perspectives of history; and
12.adjusts instruction for the different learning styles of the students.
"Protest and the American Revolution" has been designed to incorporate content, language, thinking, and study skill objectives with student-centered activities. Students are given a chance to acquire and enrich knowledge individually and cooperatively through reading tasks of authentic and adapted texts, role-plays and interviews, art projects, and library research. Because many students immigrate from countries that have experienced wars and other forms of civil disturbances, the lessons are developed around the theme of protest. Drawing from the middle school students' personal knowledge or experience with protest, the lessons extend that knowledge to relevant events and philosophies of the American revolutionary era that spawned the American democratic tradition.

Another important feature of the unit is the infusion of cultural diversity. Several lessons have been created to reflect the roles American Indians, African Americans, and women played during the Revolutionary era, and suggestions are made to help teachers relate the information to student diversity. For instance, in a lesson about protest flags, students begin by sharing flags from their countries and discussing the symbols represented. In another lesson, students are encouraged to view the pending revolution from the viewpoints of African American slaves and American Indians. The unit also incorporates authentic materials for the students to learn to analyze. One lesson focuses on political cartoons from the time period; another on contemporary songs. The Declaration of Independence is examined in a third.

The content objectives were drawn from commercial textbooks and from documents such as Lessons from History: Essential Understandings and Historical Perspectives Students Should Acquire (1992) and the California History-Social Science Framework (1987). The language objectives promote development in listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills, with specific attention to language tasks required in a social studies class, such as reading for specific information, taking notes, listening for details, presenting an oral report, and writing a comparison essay. The thinking and study skill objectives lead teachers to pose more higher-order questions and fewer rote-style tasks--asking students, for example, to make inferences and recognize symbolism.

Samples from Lessons
The following samples will help illustrate the integration of objectives. In lesson 3, "British Actions and Colonial Reactions," students read some historical sources through a cooperative jigsaw activity and then groups share information to create a flow chart. The objectives include:

Content:Students will identify British restrictions on the colonists.
Students will list ways colonists protested British restrictions.
Language:Students will discuss historical information in groups.
Students will read for detail to extract information.
Students will practice use of sequence words (first, next, then) in oral explanations.
Thinking:Students will recognize and explain cause and effect.
Students will create a flow chart.

In lesson 12, "Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington," students read and analyze two poems about these messengers and complete a compare and contrast writing activity. The objectives include:

Content:Students will identify the actions of Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington.
Students will explain the different roles people play in war.
Language:Students will listen for details and discuss poem interpretations in groups.
Students will respond to information and analytical questions.
Students will recognize rhyming words and descriptive adjectives.
Thinking:Students will compare and contrast two historical figures.
Students will analyze poems and recognize symbolism.
This social studies unit was pilot-tested in one northern Virginia school district during 1991-1992, and a revised version was field-tested in districts in New York, Maryland, California, and Florida in 1992-1993. Some of the field-test sites had classes with only LEP students; others had mixed classes of LEP and English-speaking students. After the field-testing phase was completed, the unit was be finalized and is available to interested educators.

Conclusion
Although, as outlined above, social studies can be quite challenging to LEP students, teachers and curricula must accommodate the needs of these students as they learn the content. The research project described is one current effort to address the complex issues and to make social studies teachers aware that their language minority students are important multicultural resources for the classroom.

We hope teachers will learn to validate their students' knowledge and implement strategies and techniques that integrate language, culture, and content. In turn, project staff will continue to identify promising practices effective teachers use to help language minority students participate actively in class, develop English proficiency, and learn about American culture while sharing information about their own.

Notes
1 For more information on program design, see the curriculum guidelines for English as a Second Language in such states as California, Hawaii, Arizona, and Texas and in the District of Columbia.2 For more information, contact the National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, 399 Kerr Hall, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064.

Acknowledgments
The research described in this article is supported by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education. The findings and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of OERI.

References
Beck, Isabel L., Margaret G. McKeown, and Erika W. Gromoll. "Learning from Social Studies Texts." Cognition and Instruction 6, no. 2 (1989): 99-158. Collier, Virginia. "How Long? A Synthesis of Research on Academic Achievement in a Second Language." TESOL Quarterly 23, no.2 (1989): 509-532.Crismore, Avon. Metadiscourse in Social Studies Text. Technical Report #366. Champaign, Ill.: Center for the Study of Reading, 1985.Cummins, James. "The Cross-lingual Dimensions of Language Proficiency: Implications for Bilingual Education and the Optimal Age Issue." TESOL Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1980): 175-187.History-Social Science Framework. Sacramento: California State Department of Education, 1987.

King, Melissa, Barbara Fagan, Terry Bratt, and Rod Baer. "ESL and Social Studies Instruction." In ESL in Content-area Instruction, edited by JoAnn Crandall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Regents, 1987.

Lessons From History: Essential Understandings and Historical Perspectives Students Should Acquire. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles/National Center for History in the Schools, 1992.

Short, Deborah. "Adapting Materials for Content-Based Language Instruction." ERIC News Bulletin. Washington, D.C.: ERIC/CLL, September 1989.


Deborah J. Short, Associate Division Director for ESL at the Center for Applied Linguistics, conducts research on social studies classes with English language learners for the National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. She also trains teachers and develops curricula and materials for integrated language and content instruction. ©1994©1994©1994©1994©1994©1994©1994©1994©1994©1994©1994